Nine inputs.
Your organization as it stands.
Mission Pricing replaces token roulette.
Today the same workflow costs $0.40 one run and $8.70 the next. Nobody can budget that. Metaprise quotes one fixed Mission price — and 70% of the profit on every Mission goes to the deploying partner.
Workflow-by-workflow comparison · Mid-Market
| Workflow | Tier | Today · cost / task | Var. | Mission $ | Annual volume | Annual variance $ | Partner / yr |
|---|
70% of every dollar of profit goes to the partner.
At Metaprise's 60% gross margin on a $10–$50 Mission, that's 42% of every dollar of customer revenue flowing to the deploying partner. Compare against published cloud and SaaS channel programs.
"This is the recruiting wedge. No mainstream cloud or SaaS channel program pays a partner 70% of profit. The customer gets predictable cost. The partner gets the deepest channel economics in enterprise software."
Operating Cost Assumptions
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Loaded compliance FTE cost | $180,000 / yr | BLS + 40% benefits load |
| Loaded operations FTE cost | $130,000 / yr | BLS occupational data |
| P1+P2 average incident cost | $28,000 / incident | IDC enterprise IT 2025 |
| SLA breach rate (baseline) | 15% | Gartner ITSM 2025 |
| Avg service credit / breach | $8,500 | Enterprise SaaS surveys |
| Manual touchpoints / contract | 6 | Metaprise customer telemetry; kit cites 20–40 across full C2C |
| Cost per manual touchpoint | $95 | Hackett Group P2P benchmark |
| Audit prep cost (mid-large) | $500,000 / yr | Big-4 external + internal blend |
| Cost of capital (WACC) | 8% | US large-cap 2025 median |
Reduction Coefficients
Coefficients are conservative against Metaprise customer telemetry. Sales Kit Section 4 references 70–80% manual touchpoint reduction in P2P, 40–60% MTTR reduction, and compliance evidence preparation moving from 2–4 weeks to instant. This framework applies the lower bound of each.
| Driver | Reduction |
|---|---|
| D1 · Operational touchpoints | 70% |
| D2 · Cycle time | 70% |
| D3 · Compliance hours | 40% |
| D4 · Audit headcount equivalent | 30% |
| D4 · Audit prep cost | 75% |
| D5 · Financial cycle days | 21 days |
| D6 · MTTR | 50% |
| D7 · SLA breaches | 60% |
Formulas
D1= (Contracts × 6 touchpoints × $95 × 70%) + (Compliance hours × $90/hr × 30%)D2= (Contracts × Cycle days × 70% × Daily revenue contribution × 0.6)D3= Compliance hours × $90/hr × 40%D4= (Audit headcount × $180K × 30%) + ($500K × 75%)D5= (Financial volume × Avg txn value × 21 days × WACC) ÷ 365D6= Incident volume × $28K × 50%D7= Incident volume × 15% breach rate × $8.5K × 60%
The Mission budget is derived from operational volumes: compliance Missions (1 per 10 hours), contract Missions (4 per contract — onboarding, milestone, payment, audit), incident Missions (6 per incident), and financial Missions (5% of volume), priced at the industry-blended unit cost.
Coverage Curve
Year 1: 50% coverage — a conservative build-out as the Mission library is assembled across initial use cases. Year 2: 80% with cross-workflow expansion. Year 3: 100% baseline coverage. The curve runs below typical SaaS adoption to keep the headline defensible to a finance-heavy review.
Defensibility Notes for the CFO Conversation
- This is gross operational value, not pricing. Mission budget appears as a separate line — the figure your CFO can sign.
- Per-Mission ±5% band is structural. Metaprise absorbs cross-model variance (±60%), cross-execution variance (±40%), and context bloat at the platform level. This is Sales Kit Section 1's Pay-by-Result mechanism.
- Reduction coefficients are below the kit's published ranges. Adjust upward only when customer data warrants — never adjust downward, as the framework already runs conservative.
- Working-capital figure (D5) is the most variable. Calibrate avg transaction value against actual financial-execution data before presenting to a finance-heavy buyer.